What are Conditions for Cancellation of Contract? | ANT Lawyers

When entering into a contract, the parties in a contractual relationship always aim for certain interests and purposes. However, in reality, the contract is not always implemented seriously and in good faith. According to Vietnam laws, parties are entitled to cancel the contract to protect rights and interests. Therefore, it is not rare for a party to request to cancel the contract in order not to be bound by the contract. However, it should be noted that the right of cancellation is only applied in some certain circumstances which stipulated by the law. This is to limit arbitrariness of cancelling the contract.

The basic condition for cancelling the contract is the breach. However, it should be noted that not all breaches of contract will result in cancelling the contract. This is stipulated in both of general law and specialized law. According to Commercial law 2005 (“CL”), the sanction of cancelling the contract is applied in case of breaching act be a condition for the cancellation of the contract as agreed upon by the parties or in case of substantial breach of contractual obligations from a party. Specifically, contractual breach means the failure of a party to perform, to fully or properly perform its obligations according to the agreement between the parties or the provisions of CL. Substantial breach means a contractual breach by a party, which causes damage to the other party to an extent that the other party cannot achieve the purpose of the entry into the contract. Civil Code 2015 (“CC”) also stipulates correspondingly but it uses the term “serious breach”: “A party has the right to cancel the contract and shall not be liable to compensate for damage in the following cases: (i) A breaching act of one party is a condition for the cancellation of the contract as agreed upon by the parties; (ii) The other party seriously violates the obligations in the contract; (iii) Others circumstances as provided by law. Serious violation means the failure to fulfill obligations properly by a party which make the other party cannot achieve the purpose of the entry into the contract”. However, currently there is no specific guidance on identifying the substantial breach of contractual obligations and the serious breach of contractual obligations. Therefore, determining whether a party’s breach is considered as a substantial breach of contractual obligations or a serious breach of contractual obligations will be within the competence of the jurisdiction.

A lawfully concluded contract may be canceled when a party breaches its basic contractual obligations. After cancelling the contract, such contract shall be invalid from the time it is entered into, and the parties shall not have to continue performing their contractual obligations, except for their agreements on their post-cancellation rights and obligations and resolution of disputes. The parties shall have the right to claim benefits brought about their performance of their contractual obligations. If parties have indemnity obligations, their obligations must be performed concurrently. Where it is impossible to make the indemnity with benefits which one party has enjoyed, the obliged party must make the indemnity in cash. Breached parties are entitled to claim damages.

In conclusion, from the regulation of law, it can be seen that nature of contract is to benefit for the parties and not to be canceled. The cancellation is very serious so the contract can only be canceled in some certain conditions. The contract cannot be canceled as a sanction if there is no contract breach. Simultaneously, the party requesting cancellation also needs to know that such request is only accepted if there is enough foundation to affirm that the other party has substantial breach of contractual obligations or the serious breach of contractual obligations. Parties encountering potential dispute should consult with dispute lawyers in Vietnam for proper resolution.

Read More

What Are Regulations on Debt Trading Contracts in Vietnam? | ANT Lawyers

Along with the development of socio-economic activities, right to collect debt has become an asset right, hence its transferability is also recognized. Vietnam law recognizes debt as a commodity that can be traded through a debt trading contract. However, in order for the debt trading contract to be legally valid and ensure the rights and obligations are enforced, the parties need to pay attention to the provisions on the debt trading contract.

Firstly, in terms of the right to enter into a debt trading contract, according to the provisions of the Civil Code on the sale and purchase of property rights, the property right is the right to claim debt in Vietnam. Accordingly, the right to recover debt becomes the subject of a contract that the parties can transfer as if it were a special type of property. In addition, the debt trading contract aims to transfer ownership of the right of debt recovery and at the same time transfer the debt seller’s obligations to the debt purchaser. This is a transaction that does not affect the interests of the debtor totally. Therefore, the transfer of the right to demand does not require the consent of the obligor, whereby the parties can enter into a debt trading contract without the consent of the debtor.

Secondly, in terms of the form of the debt trading contract, based on the provisions of law prescribing debt trading contract by credit institutions and foreign bank branches, debt trading contract is a written agreement on the transfer of the right to collect debt for a debt arising from a lending operation, payment on behalf of the guarantee, whereby the debt seller transfers ownership of the debt to the debt purchaser and receives payment from the debt purchaser. Therefore, the debt trading contract must be made as a written document.

Furthermore, the debt trading contract must be signed by the legal representative or the authorized representative of the debt purchase and sale parties. Therefore, according to this provision, the debt trading contract does not require the parties to be notarized or authenticated. If necessary, the parties can agree on the notarization or authentication of the debt trading contract. In addition, the parties can make an agreement that the contract can be made in a foreign language and the parties need to consent on which language of the contract will be used in case of a dispute arisen. In addition, in case the debt purchaser and debt seller are organizations with legal status, in addition to the legal representative to sign, the contract needs to be stamped. These are strict regulations on the established form to ensure the legality of the contract’s form.

Thirdly, when drafting a debt trading contract, it must contains the following principal contents: (i) Time for signing the debt trading contract; (ii) Names and addresses of the parties to the debt trading contract; (iii) Name and title of the representative of the parties to the debt trading contract; (iv) Name and address of the debtor and related parties (if any) to the purchased or sold debt; (v) Details of debt purchased and sold: Loan amount, loan period, purpose, book value of the debt up to the time of debt purchase and sale; (vi) Security measures for the debtor’s payment obligation for the purchased or sold debt (if any); (vii) Debt selling price, payment method, payment term; (viii) Time, method and procedures for transferring debt documents and records, including dossiers and documents on debt security (if any); The time the debt purchaser becomes the subrogator, the debt seller has obligations; (ix) Rights and obligations of debt sellers and debt buyers; (x) Liability of the parties for breach of contract; (xi) Settlement of arising disputes. These are the basic and mandatory contents of a debt trading contract. In addition, the parties can make agree on other contents in the debt trading contract that are not contrary to the provisions of the laws.

In addition, during the implementation of the debt trading contract, the law allows the parties to agree to amend, supplement or cancel the content of the debt trading contract. However, the decision to amend, supplement or cancel must be based on ensuring compliance with the provisions of law.

Therefore, the establishment of a debt trading contract in Vietnam is basically the same as other property rights transfer transactions. However, debt is a special object of property rights, therefore the parties need to strictly comply with the provisions of law on the content and form of the contract to ensure the legality of the contract as well as the rights and obligations of the parties. It is suggested to engage lawyers with specialization in debt recovery and dispute resolution to assist drafting or reviewing debt trading contract for its effective usage.

Read More

How to Determine Penalty and Compensation for Damages from Breach of Commercial Contract? | ANT Lawyers

When drafting a contract, especially a commercial business contract, in addition to basic provisions such as the object, scope of the contract, value and payment method, rights and obligations of the parties, dispute settlement, information confidentiality, and the regulations on the penalty for a breach of the contract and damage compensation are also very important.

Penalty for a breach of the contract

Under the provisions of the Commercial Law 2005, penalty for a breach means that the breaching party must pay a sum of money to the aggrieved party due to the breach of the violating party if the parties agree in the contract on the fine for a breach. Thus, the penalty for a breach only arises when there is a breach of the contract by the violating party and the parties have agreed on the penalty.

The law gives the right to agree on sanctions for violations to contractual parties, but this freedom to negotiate is limited. Specifically, the parties are only allowed to agree to a maximum penalty of 8% of the breached contractual obligation value, except traders providing assessment services issue assessment certificates showing incorrect results caused by their unintentional faults, they must pay penalty therefor to customers. The penalty level shall be agreed upon by the parties but must not exceed ten times the assessment service charge. In fact, the dispute settlement agency also bases on the prescribed limit of the law to handle; therefore, even if the parties agree to a higher penalty for a breach, it is not applicable in practice.

Compensation for damage

Compensation for damage means a remedy whereby the breaching party pays compensation for the loss caused by a contract-breaching act to the aggrieved party. The basis for arising damages is a breach of the contract; there is material loss and act of breaching the contract is the direct cause of the loss. Difference from penalty for a breach, liability to compensate for damages caused by breaches of contract performance obligations arises even in cases where the parties do not have an agreement on this matter. Besides, the law does not provide any regulation to limit the amount of compensation; it is based on the actual damages that the aggrieved party can prove.

When participating in the transaction, if both types of sanctions are specified in the contract, they should clearly specify the basis for the amount of compensation for the damages and the penalty for violation.

In fact, there are many cases where the parties do not agree clearly or agree on the penalty but the amount of the penalty exceeds the prescribed level, the excess could be considered invalid. The parties should also note that there will be no agreement on late payment interest on the infringement penalty and the amount of compensation damages.

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers have Attorneys in Hanoi, Attorneys in Ho Chi Minh and Attorneys in Danang, will help customers conveniently drafting contracts and assist in resolving contract disputes.

Read More

How to Determine Penalty and Compensation for Damages from Breach of Commercial Contract?

When drafting a contract, especially a commercial business contract, in addition to basic provisions such as the object, scope of the contract, value and payment method, rights and obligations of the parties, dispute settlement, information confidentiality, and the regulations on the penalty for a breach of the contract and damage compensation are also very important.

Penalty for a breach of the contract

Under the provisions of the Commercial Law 2005, penalty for a breach means that the breaching party must pay a sum of money to the aggrieved party due to the breach of the violating party if the parties agree in the contract on the fine for a breach. Thus, the penalty for a breach only arises when there is a breach of the contract by the violating party and the parties have agreed on the penalty.

The law gives the right to agree on sanctions for violations to contractual parties, but this freedom to negotiate is limited. Specifically, the parties are only allowed to agree to a maximum penalty of 8% of the breached contractual obligation value, except traders providing assessment services issue assessment certificates showing incorrect results caused by their unintentional faults, they must pay penalty therefor to customers. The penalty level shall be agreed upon by the parties but must not exceed ten times the assessment service charge. In fact, the dispute settlement agency also bases on the prescribed limit of the law to handle; therefore, even if the parties agree to a higher penalty for a breach, it is not applicable in practice.

Compensation for damage

Compensation for damage means a remedy whereby the breaching party pays compensation for the loss caused by a contract-breaching act to the aggrieved party. The basis for arising damages is a breach of the contract; there is material loss and act of breaching the contract is the direct cause of the loss. Difference from penalty for a breach, liability to compensate for damages caused by breaches of contract performance obligations arises even in cases where the parties do not have an agreement on this matter. Besides, the law does not provide any regulation to limit the amount of compensation; it is based on the actual damages that the aggrieved party can prove.

When participating in the transaction, if both types of sanctions are specified in the contract, they should clearly specify the basis for the amount of compensation for the damages and the penalty for violation.

In fact, there are many cases where the parties do not agree clearly or agree on the penalty but the amount of the penalty exceeds the prescribed level, the excess could be considered invalid. The parties should also note that there will be no agreement on late payment interest on the infringement penalty and the amount of compensation damages.

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers have Attorneys in Hanoi, Attorneys in Ho Chi Minh and Attorneys in Danang, will help customers conveniently drafting contracts and assist in resolving contract disputes

Read More